Twistypedia
Navigation
Difference between revisions of "Imaginary Piece"
From Twistypedia
Frank Tiex (talk | contribs) m |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | The set of pieces defined by Matt Galla's analysis of twistability that exist outside the set of [[Real Piece|real physical pieces]]. This is discussed in [http://twistypuzzles.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=15667 this thread] but Matt who uses a totally different analysis then Andreas. He makes no assumption of a [[Holding Point|holding point]] and instead looks at all possible way a piece CAN move. For example he looks at pieces that move with BOTH the L and R layers on a 3x3x3. Such pieces doesn't exist in Andreas's method. But Matt goes on to prove such pieces "MUST exist mathematically". While not immediately obvious it turns out the Imaginary Pieces are a superset of the [[Virtual Piece| | + | The set of pieces defined by Matt Galla's analysis of twistability that exist outside the set of [[Real Piece|real physical pieces]]. This is discussed in [http://twistypuzzles.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=15667 this thread] but Matt who uses a totally different analysis then Andreas. He makes no assumption of a [[Holding Point|holding point]] and instead looks at all possible way a piece CAN move. For example he looks at pieces that move with BOTH the L and R layers on a 3x3x3. Such pieces doesn't exist in Andreas's method. But Matt goes on to prove such pieces "MUST exist mathematically". While not immediately obvious it turns out the Imaginary Pieces are a superset of the [[Virtual Piece|Virtual Pieces]]. Andreas now prefers the term [[NHP|NHP]] for Non-Holding Point over Imaginary. |
Latest revision as of 12:31, 7 November 2021
The set of pieces defined by Matt Galla's analysis of twistability that exist outside the set of real physical pieces. This is discussed in this thread but Matt who uses a totally different analysis then Andreas. He makes no assumption of a holding point and instead looks at all possible way a piece CAN move. For example he looks at pieces that move with BOTH the L and R layers on a 3x3x3. Such pieces doesn't exist in Andreas's method. But Matt goes on to prove such pieces "MUST exist mathematically". While not immediately obvious it turns out the Imaginary Pieces are a superset of the Virtual Pieces. Andreas now prefers the term NHP for Non-Holding Point over Imaginary.
- Members: 5184
- Most recent: juliocesarvoynuevo
- Members online: and 0 hidden, as well as 7 guests and 0 web crawlers.
- Topics/posts: 37770/416738
- Some recent posts:
- Re: Clover Helicopter Skewb Diamond by Andreas Nortmann 2 hours ago.
- Re: Accomplishments thread. by AMCuber 2 hours ago.
- Ziggutrees by OSKAR by Oskar 8 hours ago.
- Re: Solving DeCETH by alacoume 10 hours ago.
- Re: Bandage Puzzle CheckMakeSolve by alacoume 10 hours ago.
- Thanks for spending your time with us
Frank
and Darren.
You are missed.