Sorry for late reply.. bz weekend.Zeotor
Thanx again for noticing my error on chopper. ..
Interesting our fren jaap
, believes that two corner center piece can be swap... has some interesting algorithmsJaap
Thanx for the algorithms... been trying it. Like you said... it sort of affect center piece... and it is a 90 degree turn that we cannot correct without another face having 90 degree problem.
Parity here right? How to get that face facing the right way?? without help from other faces? I need unique turn like pytlivyj_1
say right? Which one do i need to touch?pytlivyj_1
I really think u must be correct about the unique turn.... just that I am lost which "unique" way should I turn?
For a center piece parity, I solve the disorder, break it into two faces, u or u' like thishttp://picture5x5rubik.blogspot.com/p/step-4.html
So which unique way should I go? I have try & error.. u or u' didn't work. Just screwed up another pair of center pieces between two other faces.. I not pick the correct "unique" turn. Can you tell me which way should I turn to solve say cube below?
I dun really have the parity now on my cube.. I mistakenly tot I had it but Zeotor corrected me
. When I had it last time... d / d' & u / u' doesn't work. But when I sort of re-scramble my cube & it work.
btw, (r U2)*5 was also given to me earlier by Zeotor
, but it is simply swapping between 2 rows of corner center pieces... not only 2 corner piece. jaap
solution was closer to what I was looking for.Guys,
I have an idea... I think rather that keep on re-playing till I get the parity isn't very efficient... tiring... if we got right solution, we should be able to "invent" the parity right? I mean if we really can understand the parity.. like the parity on "middle" center pieces, I can actually create it back by introducing a single u' or u turn & solve.
If somebody here got an idea.. I think I'll just try to "reverse engineer" the corner center piece parity based on his solution. Should work right? I am getting bored re-playing 5x5.
Can anybody confirm whether this parity exist or I making a fool of myself??