View unanswered posts | View active topics
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 18 posts ] |
|
| Author |
Message |
|
Uiqoo
|
Post subject: The Best Simple Matchstick Problem Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 8:32 am |
|
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2012 11:50 pm Location: Seoul, Korea
|
Ah... Let me see... Thirteen minus seventy-one equals to four. Am I right? Yes. Attachment:
Matches.png [ 4.78 KiB | Viewed 2300 times ]
(Edit:) What is the minimum number of matches which have to be moved to correct the equation? Thanks, Gus!
_________________ Solution for Latch cube...check. Crazy 3x3 plus...all check. Master Skewb...check. Prof Pyraminx...check. Cubiest in Korea, Ready for designing.
Last edited by Uiqoo on Tue May 01, 2012 4:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Coaster1235
|
Post subject: Re: The Best Simple Matchstick Problem Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 8:49 am |
|
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2011 12:25 pm Location: Finland
|
|
Here's one solution, spoilered: (Interpret it as |3-7|=4)
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Gus
|
Post subject: Re: The Best Simple Matchstick Problem Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 8:54 am |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2009 12:00 am Location: Jarrow, England
|
|
Perhaps the problem would be better stated as What is the minimum number of matches which have to be moved to correct the equation?
_________________ Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Uiqoo
|
Post subject: Re: The Best Simple Matchstick Problem Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 8:58 am |
|
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2012 11:50 pm Location: Seoul, Korea
|
Coaster1235 wrote: Here's one solution, spoilered: (Interpret it as |3-7|=4) Nice. Gus wrote: Perhaps the problem would be better stated as How many matches have you got to move to correct the equation? Oh, That's a perfect idea. Surely better.
_________________ Solution for Latch cube...check. Crazy 3x3 plus...all check. Master Skewb...check. Prof Pyraminx...check. Cubiest in Korea, Ready for designing.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Jared
|
Post subject: Re: The Best Simple Matchstick Problem Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 7:23 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 10:16 pm Location: Somewhere Else
|
|
My answer: Just one! Put the minus sign over the equals sign to make not-equals. 1371 is not 4!
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Callum
|
Post subject: Re: The Best Simple Matchstick Problem Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 7:53 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 9:52 am
|
|
I heard another one similar to this today. Move exactly one digit in this equation to make it correct. 62 - 63 = 1
Callum
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Darren Grewe
|
Post subject: Re: The Best Simple Matchstick Problem Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 8:34 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2000 2:51 am Location: New Ulm, Minnesota, USA
|
|
How can 3-7=4?
Wouldn't that be -4 for the answer. If you want to do it the right way it would be 71-13=4 then take away the 1's. Right?!?!
_________________ Darren & Traiphum's Dual Helicoptrahedron
X-TownCuber wrote: Are my eyes deceiving me, or is this the coolest puzzle ever?
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Benf207
|
Post subject: Re: The Best Simple Matchstick Problem Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 8:44 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 5:06 pm Location: Ridgefield, Connecticut
|
Darren Grewe wrote: How can 3-7=4?
Wouldn't that be -4 for the answer. If you want to do it the right way it would be 71-13=4 then take away the 1's. Right?!?! If you're referring to coaster's solutions its the absolute value of 3-7, which is 4. |3-7| = |-4| = 4 . You also couldn't just remove the ones because it says you have to move the match sticks. Ben
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
MrSingingPizza
|
Post subject: Re: The Best Simple Matchstick Problem Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 9:13 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2012 10:20 pm
|
|
My solution: I took the 1 from 71 and turned the 7 into a 9. The equation now reads: 13-9=4. Only 2 matchsticks moved!
_________________
PuzzleMaster6262 wrote: rubixwiz031 wrote: Have you ever pooped in public? If you have, what were your experiences? No, I haven't tried that yet. Or would a bathroom stall count?
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
xGATOxMALOx
|
Post subject: Re: The Best Simple Matchstick Problem Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 9:43 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2012 3:43 am
|
|
My solution: 16-7=9 3 sticks moved
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Melysa
|
Post subject: Re: The Best Simple Matchstick Problem Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 9:57 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 7:30 pm Location: New York
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
MrSingingPizza
|
Post subject: Re: The Best Simple Matchstick Problem Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 10:12 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2012 10:20 pm
|
MizMelysaLadi wrote: Answer:
2 matches From 13-71=4 to 13-17=4 13-17= -4, not 4!
_________________
PuzzleMaster6262 wrote: rubixwiz031 wrote: Have you ever pooped in public? If you have, what were your experiences? No, I haven't tried that yet. Or would a bathroom stall count?
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
bobthegiraffemonkey
|
Post subject: Re: The Best Simple Matchstick Problem Posted: Thu May 03, 2012 6:01 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 2:34 pm Location: Scotland, UK
|
|
Yeah, I'm cheating too: 13-71=h, where h=-58. 1 matchstick moved.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
RubixFreakGreg
|
Post subject: Re: The Best Simple Matchstick Problem Posted: Thu May 03, 2012 6:16 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 11:48 am Location: In Front Of My Teraminx (saying WTF?)
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Callum
|
Post subject: Re: The Best Simple Matchstick Problem Posted: Thu May 03, 2012 8:03 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 9:52 am
|
RubixFreakGreg wrote: Callum wrote: I heard another one similar to this today. Move exactly one digit in this equation to make it correct. 62 - 63 = 1
Callum make the 6 on the top right of the 2 as to have 2 to the power of 6 : _6 2-63=1 2^6-63=64-63=1  Is there another solution ? Correct! As far as I know there is no other solution (can someone prove me wrong?). Callum
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Uiqoo
|
Post subject: Re: The Best Simple Matchstick Problem Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 12:11 am |
|
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2012 11:50 pm Location: Seoul, Korea
|
Callum wrote: RubixFreakGreg wrote: Callum wrote: I heard another one similar to this today. Move exactly one digit in this equation to make it correct. 62 - 63 = 1
Callum make the 6 on the top right of the 2 as to have 2 to the power of 6 : _6 2-63=1 2^6-63=64-63=1  Is there another solution ? Correct! As far as I know there is no other solution (can someone prove me wrong?). Callum That's may an only solution. BTW, I just found interesting thing... Pretending like just that is in matches, I can move 1 match to correct the equation: 62-63=1.
_________________ Solution for Latch cube...check. Crazy 3x3 plus...all check. Master Skewb...check. Prof Pyraminx...check. Cubiest in Korea, Ready for designing.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
DLitwin
|
Post subject: Re: The Best Simple Matchstick Problem Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 12:22 am |
|
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 5:32 pm Location: Bay Area, CA
|
Uiqoo wrote: BTW, I just found interesting thing... Pretending like just that is in matches, I can move 1 match to correct the equation: 62-63=1. Ah, nice. Solution: Move the bottom match of the '=' to the '-' to swap them: 62 = 63 - 1Dave
_________________
 LitwinPuzzles.com has info on my puzzles.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
RubixFreakGreg
|
Post subject: Re: The Best Simple Matchstick Problem Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 3:26 am |
|
Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 11:48 am Location: In Front Of My Teraminx (saying WTF?)
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 18 posts ] |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
|