It is quite funny how often you come to the same shape not matter which truncation technique you use.
The signature is: 54000A8000
It is the 9th transformation in this shape.

Very nice! I like it a lot.

Seems like you are the only one.
Sad but true.

Andreas, I love your works, too.

I am a great fan of your mods. I got a lot of ideas!!!

But in the last weeks there are only small response to new puzzles.

I may sound dumb here, but what exactly does SharpEdges refer to and what do the signatures mean that I see on most of your mods?

The signatures are where the cuts are made and parts are extended (I believe anyway). Only Andreas can understand them.

Thank you Claus for being my inspiration receiver (does such a term exist?)

@Luke Harry, Rentlix, everybody else interested:
Regarding the signatures:

First you have to understand that there is a difference between OctagonalEdges, SharpEdges, SharpCorners (only few examples) and even DodecahedralFaceDeletions (no signatures made public).
The signatures are bandaging signatures in first place. If interpreted correctly they are equivalent to truncating schemes. Apply these truncations to a 3x3x3 (or UltimateSkewb if appropriate) and afterwards place extensions on all faces left over from the original puzzle.

I see I have to write an article sometime in the future ... when I have filled up the museum.

Andreas

I too like your puzzles. You sure do churn out a quantity of them!
(Insperation reciever would be a Muse)

I like all puzzles... just don't have time to comment in every thread. But my main interest in puzzles may be a bit different then others. As an engineer its the mech which allows the puzzles to fuction that fascinates me the most. To me when the Rubik cube first came out the puzzle wasn't how to solve it... it was what keeps it from falling apart. In that light the shape of the puzzle to me is secondary. They are still interesting in that some shapes allow for "different" solutions. For example the cubic shape of a Rubik's cube hides the face center orientation. The same puzzle in the shape of an octahedron brings out this orientation but then hides the corner orientation. So the shapes that interest me the most are those which give each piece a unique position and orientation in the solved state.

That I'd love to see. I believe it would be very interesting even just from the geometry stand point alone.

Carl